Wednesday, 25 April 2012

Lib Dem MEPs kill the ACTA web snooping plans

Some good news for a change when it comes to authoritarian plans to spy on what people are doing on the internet.

Today Lib Dem MEPs, and the group they sit in in the European Parliament (the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe), announced that they are killing the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). Because they've done so, there's now a majority in parliament against ACTA, which means that it's as good as dead.

This is a good thing because, despite the name, ACTA would have done very little to stop counterfeiting as it wouldn't have included China and other developing countries where most counterfeit goods are produced. On the other hand, it would have done all sorts of other nasty things - such as:
Here's what Fiona Hall, leader of Lib Dem MEPs, said on the matter:
"We have had a very close look at ACTA because the protection of intellectual property rights is important for our knowledge-based economy and for our consumers who need to be protected from potentially dangerous counterfeit products such as toys, medicines and electronics.

"On balance, however, ACTA falls short on too many fronts. First, it does not include many emerging economies, such as China, which are the main sources for counterfeited goods. Second, according to the European Data Protection Supervisor, ACTA would allow 'indiscriminate or widespread monitoring' of internet users without providing sufficient safeguards. This is why Lib Dem MEPs have decided to pull the plug on ACTA"  
So, three cheers for Lib Dem MEPs. Great to see them standing up against illiberal and regressive plans. Now if only we could get Clegg to do the same...

2 comments:

  1. George - ACTA isn't about web snooping, it's about creating more severe policing of piracy ... but it's still good that it's being opposed!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it created the potential for massive infringement of internet privacy which is why I mentioned that specifically in the title. In the post itself I cover all the various aspects of why ACTA is bad.

      Delete

I'm indebted to Birkdale Focus for the following choice of words:

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.